ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Previous randomized trials suggest the benefit of inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings. We evaluated available studies on the effect of the therapeutic use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on mortality and pertinent clinical outcomes. METHOD(S): A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the WHO, LitCOVID, and EMBASE databases from inception until June 30th, 2022. The primary outcome was overall mortality and secondary outcomes included symptom-based clinical improvement rates at day 14, ER visits or hospitalization, and adverse events. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager Software, version 5.2, to evaluate the combined odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. RESULT(S): Nine studies (7 RCTs (3 budesonide, 3 ciclesonide, 1 fluticasone RCTs), & 2 observational studies) were included in the mortality meta-analysis. Of the 3,934 patients included, 103 patients died (44 out of 1925 in the ICS group and 59 out of 2009 in the non-ICS group). The odds of mortality in the therapeutic ICS use group were lower compared to the non-ICS therapy group (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.28, p-value=0.33, I2=0%). The result was statistically insignificant, possibly due to the low mortality rate. But therapeutic ICS showed statistically significant clinical improvement rates at day 14 (5 RCTs;3 Ciclesonide, 2 Budesonide) (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31-1.86, p < 0.0001, I2=0%). The number of ED visits/Hospitalization rate, and adverse events were not statistically significant between the groups (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.32-1.70, p= 0.47 I2=75% and OR 1.10 95% CI 0.67-1.82, p=0.70, I2=28%). CONCLUSION(S): This meta-analysis shows that the therapeutic use of ICS in COVID-19 is associated with higher symptom-based clinical improvement rates. Although the reduction in mortality odds remained insignificant, as the overall mortality rates were low which increased the confidence interval overall. Early administration of ICS showed a trend towards the reduced likelihood of urgent care needs. Well-designed trials are needed to explore ICS efficacy in patients with a high risk of disease progression and in reducing the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Studies of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have found varying clinical outcomes associated with underlying respiratory conditions and inhaled corticosteroid use. We performed a systematic review to summarize the effect of the pre-hospital use of inhaled corticosteroids on the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. METHOD(S): A comprehensive literature accrual was conducted across the WHO, CDC, and LitCovid PubMed COVID-19 databases from inception until June 30th, 2022. The Overall mortality was the primary outcome, and the secondary outcomes were the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). All included studies were observational and reported the desired outcomes with pre-hospital use of ICS in COVID-19 patients. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager Software, version 5.2 to evaluate the combined odds ratio (OR) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. RESULT(S): Nineteen studies assessed mortality and were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1,122,329 patients were included, of which 10,466 patients died (2,289 out of 824,005 in ICS arm patients and 8,177 out of 298,324 in the non-ICS arm), resulting in the unadjusted odds of death (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.70, I2=82%). However, In the subgroups analyses of COPD patients (8 studies;598 out of 106,659 in the ICS arm and 353 out of 44,496 in the non-ICS arm) and Asthma patients (7 studies;705 out of 714,126 in the ICS arm and 179 out of 222,577 in the non-ICS arm), significantly increased risk of death was not shown (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.93-1.57, I2=32%, OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97-2.66, I2=82% respectively). There were no significantly increased odds in the assessed secondary outcomes;ICU admission (13 studies, OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.82-1.51, I2=84%), need for mechanical ventilation (7 studies, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.45, I2=0%). CONCLUSION(S): Prehospital use of ICS in COVID-19 patients is associated with higher odds of overall mortality in unadjusted analysis. However, this was not shown in the subgroup of patients with a history of COPD or Asthma. Other clinical outcomes such as the need for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation show similar trends. Future research with well-designed clinical trials is needed to validate our findings.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Achromobacter denitrificans bacteremia is a rare condition and generally affects adults with multiple comorbidities and is usually a hospital acquired infection. We report a case of hospital acquired Achromobacter denitrificans bacteremia in a young female without any comorbidities, who presented to the hospital with severe viral pneumonia. DESCRIPTION: A 33-year-old female was presented to the ER with increasing difficulty in breathing. On examination, she had labored breathing. Her oxygen saturation was 80% at room air. With oxygen support via face mask, her saturation increased to 83% with 15 L/min. Then non-invasive ventilation via BiPAP it improved to 90% and she was admitted to the medical ICU. Meanwhile, as per history from the husband, she had a cough and coryza for the past one week and was taking over the counter medications. Lab investigations at the time of admission reported WBC count as 7500/ cumm. She was tested negative for COVID-19. HR CT-scan showed bilateral ground glass opacities with bilateral patchy consolidations. For worsening hypoxia, she was intubated and placed on ventilator support (FiO2:60%). Her blood and urine culture reports were negative. The Liver function tests showed elevated SGOT/SGPT, suggesting acute hypoxic liver injury. Supportive care with IV steroids, and broad-spectrum antibiotics Pipercillin and Tazobactam was provided. In the second week, the patient's WBC started rising and peaked at 40,000/cumm on Day-10. Her condition worsened further despite being on 100% FiO2. The tracheal sample grew a colony of Acinetobacter Baumannii, while her blood cultures reported positive for A. Denitrificans sensitive to Pipercillin and Tazobactum. Chest X-Ray suggested features of acute respiratory distress syndrome with no signs of a cavitary lesion or abscess. Ultrasound abdomen and Echocardiography ruled out other sources of infection. Despite ventilatory support and medications, the patient deteriorated, and passed away after cardiorespiratory arrest. DISCUSSION: Achromobacter denitrificans cause opportunistic nosocomial infections, which has been recovered from ventilators, humidifiers, "sterile" saline, and IV fluids. A. denitrificans is associated with pneumonia, peritonitis, bacteremia, endocarditis, empyema, renal abscess, and pancreatic pseudocysts.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The reduction of mortality in COVID-19 has been clinically established only for Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab to date, but the overall mortality in COVID-19 remains high. Baricitinib is a Janus Kinase 1/2 Inhibitor with known anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties. The US FDA recently approved Baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring either supplemental oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and observational studies assessing the effect of Baricitinib on mortality outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHOD(S): A systematic literature search was conducted on electronic databases including NIH LitCovid, WHO COVID-19 database, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central from inception until June 30th, 2022. Randomized Controlled Trials and observational studies evaluating the efficacy of Baricitinib in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were screened for the assessment of all-cause mortality as the outcome. RESULT(S): Twenty-three studies (18 observational and 5 RCTs) were included in the mortality meta-analysis. Of the 16,390 patients (4,565 observational, 11,825 RCTs), 2,139 patients died (903 out of 7,610 in the Baricitinib arm and 1,236 out of 8,780 in the non-Baricitinib arm). Using the random-effects model, the odds of mortality in the therapeutic Baricitinib use showed a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.90;p=0.008, I2=79%). A similar trend of decreased mortality was observed in the subgroup analysis by study design (Observational OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, p=0.04, I2=83%;RCTs OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, p=0.01, I2=53%). CONCLUSION(S): Baricitinib used along with the standard of care treatments is associated with a reduction in mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its hepatic manifestation, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have a rising prevalence worldwide in the background of the ongoing global pandemic. It is imperative to explore the relationship with COVID-19 to improve patient care and treatment protocols for better outcomes. This metaanalysis aims to investigate the association between NAFLD and MAFLD with the severity of COVID-19 infection and the need for mechanical ventilation. METHOD(S): A systematic review of literature across 5 databases was conducted from January 2019 to June 2022. Observational studies or clinical trials were included. Studies that evaluated NAFLD/ MAFLD using laboratory methods, non-invasive imaging, or liver biopsy were included. The study protocol was registered in Prospero and Prisma guidelines were followed (Figure 1). Meta-analysis was performed on studies with mechanical ventilation and severity of COVID-19 infection outcomes using Revman software. The Mantel- Haenszel odds ratio was generated to describe the overall effect size using random effect models. RESULT(S): Mechanical Ventilation A total of 36,817 patients from twelve studies were included in the qualitative analysis. There were 5615 patients in the NAFLD group and 31,202 patients in the Non-NAFLD group. A total of 3148 patients with COVID-19 required mechanical ventilation;778 (13.8%) in the NAFLD group and 782 (2.5%) in the Non-NAFLD group with high odds of need for mechanical ventilation (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.06-3.88, p-value=0.03, I2=95%) (Figure 2). COVID-19 Severity A total of 5286 patients from fourteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 2716 patients were in the NAFLD group, while 2570 patients were in the Non-NAFLD group. A total of 1,623 patients had increased severity of COVID-19;901 (33.1%) in the NAFLD group and 722 (28.9%) in the Non-NAFLD group. COVID-19 patients with NAFLD had worse COVID-19 infection outcomes compared to those without NAFLD (OR 1.59, 95%CI 1.12-2.26, p-value=0.01, I2=81%) (Figure 4). CONCLUSION(S): Our meta-analysis suggests that NAFLD patients had higher odds of needing mechanical ventilation or ICU admission and developing more severe forms of COVID-19 than Non-NAFLD patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with COVID-19 is still an ongoing debate. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of NAFLD/ MAFLD on the duration of ICU and hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. METHOD(S): A systematic review of literature from January 2019- to June 2022 on databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Science Direct, and Web of science was conducted. Observational studies or clinical trials were included. Studies that assessed NAFLD/ MAFLD using lab assessment, non-invasive imaging, or liver biopsy were included. The protocol of the study was registered in Prospero and Prisma guidelines were followed (Figure 1). The meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Mantel- Haenszel odds ratio was generated to describe the overall effect size using random effect models. RESULT(S): ICU Admission A total of 37,109 patients from fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis. A total of 5624 patients were in the NAFLD group and 31,485 patients were in the Non-NAFLD group, where 3148 patients with COVID-19 required ICU admission. Out of these, 1098 (19.5%) were in the NAFLD group and 2050 (6.5%) in the Non-NAFLD group. We observed a significantly increased ICU admission among COVID-19 patients with NAFLD compared to those without NAFLD (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.02- 2.72, p-value= 0.04). (Figure 2). Hospital Admission A total of 27,683 patients from three studies were included in the qualitative analysis. A total of 1128 patients in the NAFLD group and 26,555 patients in the Non-NAFLD group, where 4019 patients with COVID-19 required hospital admission. Out of these, 518 (45.9%) were in the NAFLD group and 3501(13.1%) in the Non-NAFLD group. We observed a significant increase in hospital admissions among COVID-19 patients with NAFLD compared to those without NAFLD (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.10-6.70, p-Value=0.03). CONCLUSION(S): The NAFLD patients may have increased ICU and hospital admission compared to Non-NAFLD Patients. Fatty liver disease has an association with increased healthcare admission and critical care service utilization among COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events are poor prognostic indicators of COVID-19 disease. There is a discrepancy in the results of different studies regarding the effects of chronic anticoagulation on clinical outcomes. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on the impact of chronic anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in COVID-19. METHOD(S): A Literature search was performed on LitCovid PubMed, WHO, and Embase databases from inception (December 2019) till May 2022. Our eligibility criteria included original studies that reported the association between prior use of anticoagulants for unrelated indications at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and the patient outcomes in adults suffering from COVID-19. The risk of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 infected patients on chronic anticoagulation is the primary outcome and severity of COVID-19 disease in terms of ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation requirements, and all-cause mortality were the secondary outcomes. Random effects models were used to compute crude ODDs ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): A total of 44 observational studies met our inclusion criteria. In unadjusted analysis, prior anticoagulation was not associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients (N=43851, 9 studies, OR 0.67 [0.22, 2.07];p= 0.49;I2= 95%). However, pre-hospital use of anticoagulants significantly increase the risk of allcause mortality in COVID-19 patients (N= 580601;37 studies, OR 1.56 [1.22, 2.01];p=0.0005;I2= 97%). There was no statistically significant association between prehospital anticoagulants usage and COVID-19 disease severity (N=186239;20 studies, OR 0.96 [0.70, 1.33];p= 0.82;I2= 88%). Pooling adjusted estimates revealed no statistically significant association between pre-hospital use of anticoagulants and risk of Thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients (aOR= 0.85 [0.34, 2.12];p= 0.72), COVID-19 related mortality (aOR= 0.93 [0.82, 1.07];p= 0.32), and the severity of COVID-19 infection (aOR= 0.96 [0.72, 1.30];p= 0.81). CONCLUSION(S): Prehospital use of anticoagulation was not significantly associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events, improved survival, and lower severity of disease in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A rise in the incidents of violence against Health Care Workers (HCWs) in recent years calls for improvement in modes of spreading awareness and educating the public. We aimed to conduct a large global cross-sectional survey called ViSHWaS- Violence Study of Healthcare Workers and Systems in the departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Emergency medicine. METHOD(S): A global survey after tool validation, was created using REDCap forms and distributed from June 5th to July 24th, 2022. Communication tools including emails, phone calls, SMS, and social media applications like WhatsApp, Twitter, and LinkedIn were used in securing responses. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULT(S): Total of 598 responses from 69 countries, out of these 445 (74%) were complete. The maximum responses were from India (N=49), followed by the USA (N=44) and while those from the other 67 countries ranged from N=1-30. Out of these, 221 (50%) were female, the majority (56%) were in the 26-35 years category, followed by (19%) in 36-45 years. The participants encompassed 156 (35%) consultants, 97 (22%) nurses and the rest were residents/fellows in training, auxiliary/ staff, advanced registered nurse practitioners (ARNP), physician assistants (PA), researcher and others. The vast majority (73%) reported facing violence within the past year;Verbal (63%) and physical (39%) were the most commonly reported. Total 126 (28.3%) reported that patient and/or family member as the type of aggressor they/ their colleague encountered most frequently. A majority (75%) reported that the incidence of violence has either stayed the same (39%) or increased (36%) during COVID-19 pandemic. Because of violent episodes, 48% felt less motivated/ had decreased job satisfaction;an additional 25% were willing to quit. While half of respondents were familiar with Occupational Safety and Health standards, only 20% felt prepared to handle aggressive situation. CONCLUSION(S): In this global cross-sectional survey, a majority of HCWs reported to have faced violence. They felt that it either increased or stayed the same during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has led to decreased job satisfaction. Majority of those, who responded, felt unprepared to handle the violence.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Limited data exists on CT chest abnormalities during acute Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and associated post-illness loss of lung function among lung transplant (LT) patients. Method(s): The institutional database was interrogated for any LT patient diagnosed with COVID-19 during a one-year period (March 2020 to Feb 2021;n=54). 44 patients with acute COVID-19 were alive at 3-month follow up (COVID-survivors: 81.5%). Of the survivors, 34 had a CT chest during the first two weeks of acute illness. A validated CT score was used to quantify the parenchymal abnormalities due to COVID-19. Each lung was divided into 10 separate regions which were scored 0-2 based on the severity and extent of parenchymal opacification (maximum score per lung=20). To avoid confounding from underlying lung disease, only the allograph was assessed in single LT. The average score of both lungs was calculated in bilateral LT. The primary outcome measure was sustained decline of FEV1 or FVC >10% from pre-infection spirometry. Result(s): Abnormal CT score and lung opacities on CT chest were nearly ubiquitous during acute COVID-19 illness (>0;36/37, 97.3%, median score with IDR: 7.25, 4.625-10.125). The lower lobes (LL) were more affected by COVID-19 than the upper and middle lobes (UML) (median CT score in LL: 4, 2.75-6 vs 3.5, 1.25-5 in UML). A >10% decline in FEV1 or FVC was common after COVID-19 pneumonia (38.2%). The overall CT score correlated with amount of lung function loss (r=0.36, p=0.03) although the association was modest and limited to regions reflecting the UML. On ROC curve, CT score was modestly predictive of lung function decline (Fig 1). CT score from UML had the highest area under the curve (78.2%, 61.1-95.4%;p=0.006) with a score of 4.5 being the best cut-off (sensitivity 71%, specificity 85% for post-COVID lung function loss >10%). An UML CT score >4.5 was strongly associated with respiratory failure during acute illness (69% vs 24%;OR: 7.2, 1.5-33.8;p=0.01) and lung function decline >10% (77% vs 19%;OR: 14.2, 2.6-76.7;p=0.001). Conclusion(s): The CT score during acute COVID-19 infection provides prognostic information regarding loss of lung function among LT patients who survive COVID-19. Parenchymal abnormalities in the UML best predict subsequent lung function loss.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: There is limited data on the outcomes beyond the acute illness among lung transplant (LT) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current study sought to describe the predictors of 6-month survival among a single center cohort of LT. *Methods: We included all the LT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during a one-year period (March 2020 to Feb 2021;n=54;median age: 60, 20-73 years;M:F 37:17). All patients completed at least 6-month follow up from COVID-19 diagnosis. We reviewed patient characteristics, presenting features, clinical course, and laboratory abnormalities at presentation and during the acute illness. We reviewed the hospital course and post-discharge outcomes including lung function loss among COVID-19 survivors. Median follow-up duration was 304 days. Six-month survival after COVID-19 was analyzed as the primary outcome variable. Result(s): Restrictive lung disease was the most common LT indication (n=41, 75.9%) and most had undergone bilateral LT (n=43, 79.6%). Patients were a median of 48 months (range <1-139 months) from their transplant. Majority of the patients required hospitalization (n=48) and significant proportion of patients developed respiratory failure (n=26). One month survival was 90.7% (n=49) while the survival dropped to 81.5% (n=44) by 6-month follow-up. On univariate analysis, females (35.3% vs 10.8%) and those with pre-existing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD, 33.3% vs 11.1%) experienced worse 6-month survival. Peak lactate dehydrogenase (LD) levels had the strongest association with 6-month survival on Mann Whitney U comparisons. On receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, the peak LD levels had an area under the curve of 82.9% (69.1-96.7%, p=0.002) with 400 U/L identified as the best cut-off. A peak LD level >400 U/L during the acute illness from COVID-19 was significantly associated with worse 6-month survival (OR, 95% CI: 4.38, 1.31-14.65, p=0.02).On Cox proportion hazard analysis, female gender (adjusted HR: 5.38, 1.13-25.64;p=0.035), pre-infection CLAD (5.63, 1.24-25.57;p=0.025) and peak LD levels >400 U/L (7.49, 1.72-35.53;p=0.007, see Figure for the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) were independently associated with survival after COVID-19 among LT patients. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 is associated with significant mortality among LT patients with several patients succumbing beyond the period of acute illness. Female gender, established CLAD prior to COVID-19 and an LD>400 U/L at any time during the acute illness are adverse prognostic markers and may form the basis of customized management strategies. (Table Presented).